International Arms Trade and Intrastate Conflict (IATIC)
International arms trade and intrastate conflicts: Dynamic analyses of arms imports and their effects on conflict potential, risk of conflict outbreak and state repression
Project granted by the German Foundation for Peace Research/Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung
Since the beginning of the century, imports of major conventional weapons have been steadily on the rise. Trade in small arms and light weapons has also seen an ongoing surge already since the 1990s. In a similar evolution, the number of violent intrastate conflicts and fatalities have risen, especially in the last 10 years. In 2014, the deadliest year since 1994, over 100,000 have died due to civil conflicts. Public debate about the potentially calamitous effects of the arms trade has intensified in many of the largest exporting nations like Germany, and especially export permissions to autocratic states have drawn stark criticism. However, the political discourse is so far lacking reliable empirical evidence how traded arms actually impact the risks and dynamics of intrastate wars.
The goal of the research project is thus to analyze the effects of the arms trade and military capabilities of governments and rebel groups on intrastate conflicts. Our theoretical starting points are game-theoretical approaches of conflict escalation and avoidance, bargaining and contest function approaches and theories of insurgency and counter-insurgeny. With extensive statistical analyses, it is examined whether and under which conditions arms imports 1) escalate latent intrastate conflicts or contribute to stabilization, 2) increase conflict intensity, 3) prolong or shorten conflicts, and 4) lead to higher extents of repression and human rights violations.
For a complete picture of the military capabilities of the warring parties, the existing datasets on arms trade provided by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) and the Norwegian Initiative on Small Arms Transfers (NISAT) are not sufficient, as they do not cover non-state actors comprehensively. Thus, the project collects data on the military endowment of non-state actors by document analysis of multiple informative sources and combining existing data, e.g. from the Small Arms Survey (SAS). The statistical analyses are based on a theoretical model that identifies and parametrizes the effects of arms transfers to conflict countries. The methodological focus in the empirical evaluation lies on dynamic analysis methods that account for the fact that arms imports do not only impact conflicts, but can also be caused by conflicts in the first place. This so-called problem of endogeneity has not been considered sufficiently in studies on these issues so far. To achieve causal identification of the effects of arms imports, the project employs structural equation models and innovative instrumental variable approaches.
The findings of the project will allow to assess how imports of major conventional weapons and small arms affect intrastate conflicts, state repression and human rights violations, and how conflicts in turn impact the demand for weapons transfers. The project thus contributes to the foundational research on arms trade and conflicts. The results are valuable for a wide range of political debates, e.g. on how to design export guidelines that align with ethic criteria for responsible politics of exporting arms. Based on the empirical evidence of this project, political debates and decisions will rely on a much better understanding of potential consequences of arms transfers.
Publications and Working Papers
Pamp, Oliver, Lukas Rudolph, Paul W. Thurner, Andreas Mehltretter, Simon Primus, 2018: The build-up of coercive capacities. Arms imports and the outbreak of violent intrastate conflicts. Journal of Peace Research 55(4): 430–444.
Mehrl, Marius, Paul W. Thurner, 2019: Military Technology and Human Loss in Intrastate Conflict: The Conditional Impact of Arms Imports. (Submitted.)
Mehltretter, Andreas, Paul W. Thurner, Maximilian Scherer, 2019: Do Governmental Weapons Build-ups Prolong or Shorten Intrastate Conflicts? An Instrumental Variable Survival Approach. (Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association Conference 2019, April 6, Chicago.)
Mehltretter, Andreas, 2019: Arming for conflict, arming for peace? How imports of small arms and major weapons affect the risk of intrastate conflicts. (Paper presented at the Conflict Research Society Annual Conference 2017, September 19, Oxford.)
Photo Credits: Left photo is by "The U.S. Army", obtained from https://www.flickr.com/photos/35703177@N00/543865056 and licensed under CC BY 2.0., Center photo is by Simon Forbes, obtained from https://www.flickr.com/photos/30656615@N05/4226629098 and licensed under CC BY 2.0., Right photo is by "Virginia Guard Public Affairs", obtained from https://www.flickr.com/photos/35101671@N06/36749722631 and licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.